Things that make you go, nah!

Messages
1,731
I just don't get the SA thing at all. It comes across to me as hard work, you're still paying for sex but adding the complication of a relationship of sorts. Simple paid fuck v complicated paid fuck? I'll stick to simple.
I think the point is it's a specific way of hooking up wealthy older men with younger women who don't want to whore, but are happy to see one guy (maybe two) to pay their way through uni. The trouble is it's been diluted, so now you have older women on there, scamming younger women, predatory men looking for gullible students etc. etc. It's always had a slightly seedy, distasteful air to me.
 
Seeing cock on a a SP profile, either husband, boyfriend, punter, sheathed or bare.
No, no,no. Of course cocks and SP go together, but I don't want to see random cocks in the pictures.
 
Messages
3,749
I think the point is it's a specific way of hooking up wealthy older men with younger women who don't want to whore, but are happy to see one guy (maybe two) to pay their way through uni. The trouble is it's been diluted, so now you have older women on there, scamming younger women, predatory men looking for gullible students etc. etc. It's always had a slightly seedy, distasteful air to me.
It also attract gullible men who can't afford to support someone in the way that most on there are looking for.
 
1. The phrase “new in the town”
2. A list of extras as long as my dick
3. Shit pictures and I don’t mean quality, just no effort or thought behind them
4. Extensive facial piercings
5. Hair shorter than shoulder length (9 times out of 10)
6. Party girl
7. Sploshing pics
8. Giant pictures made of text - honestly, what kind of prick...
9. “Some” tattoos (mainly sleeves and neck, otherwise I might quite like them)
10. Giant, painful looking, fake tits
I don’t mind short hair, but agree with the rest
 
Messages
27
I agree with loads said already, ones I think haven't yet been mentioned

Lack of phone number
Request for your photo to be sent to them
Young (or young looking) girls pretending to be underage (or appealing to that market anyway)

And on likes list, anyone who has pussy pumping ticked - just shows me that unless you're a very niche escort, you've not bothered to understand the services you offer / it was written by a pimp
 
- Poor quality photos.
- Contradictory profile information.
- Bareback photos or any photos with cock in them.
- Putting other SPs down.
- Long winded and repetitive profiles.
There’s no doubt a few more.
 
I think the point is it's a specific way of hooking up wealthy older men with younger women who don't want to whore, but are happy to see one guy (maybe two) to pay their way through uni. The trouble is it's been diluted, so now you have older women on there, scamming younger women, predatory men looking for gullible students etc. etc. It's always had a slightly seedy, distasteful air to me.
In my experience there are genuine people on there, but the over all concern is that it is so open to abuse and uneducated views on sexual health it really isn't worth it.
 
Might not make me go nah exactly but may give pause for thought - a profile that has the general air of disinterest about it - is more than a few years old (not in itself bad) and looks like it has never been updated - has a couple of blogs that were posted 5 years ago and then nothing since, a line in the profile that says she’ll be unavailable that is 18 months old, despite the fact she logs in every day, that sort of thing.
I think this might be one of the unspecific things I talked about earlier that moves me on - profiles that clearly haven't been updated in years.

Currently on holiday, back 2nd Aug 2013.
 
I'm asking this one for escorts to answer (though obviously punters will chip in too :)) cos I've always wondered what their perspective is on it. In field reports where the punter spouts the, "I won't go into detail, what happened between us will stay between us," or some such similar line, does it make you cringe and not want to meet with him again, like you're worried he might be developing feelings? Whenever I see it written, I always get frustrated there's not an option for us to leave comments.
 
I'm asking this one for escorts to answer (though obviously punters will chip in too :)) cos I've always wondered what their perspective is on it. In field reports where the punter spouts the, "I won't go into detail, what happened between us will stay between us," or some such similar line, does it make you cringe and not want to meet with him again, like you're worried he might be developing feelings? Whenever I see it written, I always get frustrated there's not an option for us to leave comments.
I actually think this can be viewed a couple of ways depending on the precise wording.
1) I’m a gentleman and a gentleman never tells - the punter is a deluded prick who thinks he’s special and she loved it and came like a fountain
2) it was great, the usual stuff happened, I don’t need to go into clinical detail - fairly sensible, normal punter who doesn’t feel the need to write a blow by blow account of what might (or might not) have happened for wanking material and to appeal to those fan boy wankers who want to know every detail.
 
When I first discovered AW and before I had my first punt I looked on field reports as a genuinely useful resource. Then it clicked that none of them ever said anything that wasn't positive so I stopped looking. They've never been of use to in choosing who I'd like to see.
 
Messages
1,625
When I first discovered AW and before I had my first punt I looked on field reports as a genuinely useful resource. Then it clicked that none of them ever said anything that wasn't positive so I stopped looking. They've never been of use to in choosing who I'd like to see.
Might be useful if you ever decide to be an author for Mills and Boon though!
 
Messages
2,087
When I first discovered AW and before I had my first punt I looked on field reports as a genuinely useful resource. Then it clicked that none of them ever said anything that wasn't positive so I stopped looking. They've never been of use to in choosing who I'd like to see.
I think some show things which the reviewer thinks are positive which would put me off - and that is helpful

But I do think if you later read a number of reviews of SP's you have seen a few times you would generally find the reviews seem a reasonable guideline to a booking - but you cannot especially rely on it the other way round as a definite recommendation
 
I'm asking this one for escorts to answer (though obviously punters will chip in too :)) cos I've always wondered what their perspective is on it. In field reports where the punter spouts the, "I won't go into detail, what happened between us will stay between us," or some such similar line, does it make you cringe and not want to meet with him again, like you're worried he might be developing feelings? Whenever I see it written, I always get frustrated there's not an option for us to leave comments.
Unpopular opinion time but I quite like when punters do this. There's no need for a totally over the top, badly written, piece of erotica.
Did I provide the services requested/advertised?
Do I look like my pictures?
Are my stats accurate?
Did I have a good attitude?
Did I clockwatch?
Did I offer a shower?
How were my comms?

This^ is the kind of helpful, objective stuff that should be in a field report or review. And as long as those details are covered, there really isn't a need to be writing shit like "Her meaty pussy was dripping wet the moment I touched her, so I fucked her hard in 10 positions and then she rimmed my arsehole like a champ while I fingered her and made her squirt! Then I spunked all over her pretty face to finish..."
Dude. No.

I do find quite a lot of the guys who write "I won't go into detail..." are actually guys who either have a fetish they would prefer not to be publicly declaring for all to read. Or they really enjoy a good fluffy booking with lots of cuddles and rolling around the bed giggling (also not something a lot of men want to be admitting to publicly it seems.)
As long as the important, objective, facts are covered, it's all good. The rest is just potentially misleading subjective opinion and unnecessary written wank material for both the author's pleasure/ego and the pleasure of the voyeurs who enjoy reading those types of reviews :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Messages
1,625
Unpopular opinion time but I quite like when punters do this. There's no need for a totally over the top, badly written, piece of erotica.
Did I provide the services requested/advertised?
Do I look like my pictures?
Are my stats accurate?
Did I have a good attitude?
Did I clockwatch?
Did I offer a shower?
How were my comms?

This^ is the kind of helpful, objective stuff that should be in a field report or review. And as long as those details are covered, there really isn't a need to be writing shit like "Her meaty pussy was dripping wet the moment I touched her, so I fucked her hard in 10 positions and then she rimmed my arsehole like a champ while I fingered her and made her squirt! Then I spunked all over her pretty face to finish..."
Dude. No.

I do find quite a lot of the guys who write "I won't go into detail..." are actually guys who either have a fetish they would prefer not to be publicly declaring for all to read. Or they really enjoy a good fluffy booking with lots of cuddles and rolling around the bed giggling (also not something a lot of men want to be admitting to publicly it seems.)
As long as the important, objective, facts are covered, it's all good. The rest is just potentially misleading subjective opinion and unnecessary written wank material for both the author's pleasure/ego and the pleasure of the voyeurs who enjoy reading those types of reviews :rolleyes:
Indeed, some "punters" IMO are trying to create their own "brands" with the utter shit they write in these reviews. Keep it factual and cover the points you raised / price paid. The rest is purely an ego trip and TBH I discard such reviews when deciding whether or not to punt a specific WG.
 
Unpopular opinion time but I quite like when punters do this. There's no need for a totally over the top, badly written, piece of erotica.
Did I provide the services requested/advertised?
Do I look like my pictures?
Are my stats accurate?
Did I have a good attitude?
Did I clockwatch?
Did I offer a shower?
How were my comms?

This^ is the kind of helpful, objective stuff that should be in a field report or review. And as long as those details are covered, there really isn't a need to be writing shit like "Her meaty pussy was dripping wet the moment I touched her, so I fucked her hard in 10 positions and then she rimmed my arsehole like a champ while I fingered her and made her squirt! Then I spunked all over her pretty face to finish..."
Dude. No.

I do find quite a lot of the guys who write "I won't go into detail..." are actually guys who either have a fetish they would prefer not to be publicly declaring for all to read. Or they really enjoy a good fluffy booking with lots of cuddles and rolling around the bed giggling (also not something a lot of men want to be admitting to publicly it seems.)
As long as the important, objective, facts are covered, it's all good. The rest is just potentially misleading subjective opinion and unnecessary written wank material for both the author's pleasure/ego and the pleasure of the voyeurs who enjoy reading those types of reviews :rolleyes:
Genuinely lol'd reading that :)
 
Messages
3,377
Unpopular opinion time but I quite like when punters do this. There's no need for a totally over the top, badly written, piece of erotica.
Did I provide the services requested/advertised?
Do I look like my pictures?
Are my stats accurate?
Did I have a good attitude?
Did I clockwatch?
Did I offer a shower?
How were my comms?

This^ is the kind of helpful, objective stuff that should be in a field report or review. And as long as those details are covered, there really isn't a need to be writing shit like "Her meaty pussy was dripping wet the moment I touched her, so I fucked her hard in 10 positions and then she rimmed my arsehole like a champ while I fingered her and made her squirt! Then I spunked all over her pretty face to finish..."
Dude. No.

I do find quite a lot of the guys who write "I won't go into detail..." are actually guys who either have a fetish they would prefer not to be publicly declaring for all to read. Or they really enjoy a good fluffy booking with lots of cuddles and rolling around the bed giggling (also not something a lot of men want to be admitting to publicly it seems.)
As long as the important, objective, facts are covered, it's all good. The rest is just potentially misleading subjective opinion and unnecessary written wank material for both the author's pleasure/ego and the pleasure of the voyeurs who enjoy reading those types of reviews :rolleyes:
Agreed, in my earlier review days, I used to go into a bit more detail but haven't for years now.

I confirm the following; appearance, services and skill level.

That's about it. The details stay in my head.
 
Messages
396
In regard to walking when seeing a face I don’t like I’m really bad at it. I tend to just get on and make the most of it, not wanting to hurt their feelings. This is punting, sometimes you gamble and it doesn’t pay off. There are no guarantees. I prefer a face pic but I understand discretion.
 
Unpopular opinion time but I quite like when punters do this. There's no need for a totally over the top, badly written, piece of erotica.
Did I provide the services requested/advertised?
Do I look like my pictures?
Are my stats accurate?
Did I have a good attitude?
Did I clockwatch?
Did I offer a shower?
How were my comms?

This^ is the kind of helpful, objective stuff that should be in a field report or review. And as long as those details are covered, there really isn't a need to be writing shit like "Her meaty pussy was dripping wet the moment I touched her, so I fucked her hard in 10 positions and then she rimmed my arsehole like a champ while I fingered her and made her squirt! Then I spunked all over her pretty face to finish..."
Dude. No.

I do find quite a lot of the guys who write "I won't go into detail..." are actually guys who either have a fetish they would prefer not to be publicly declaring for all to read. Or they really enjoy a good fluffy booking with lots of cuddles and rolling around the bed giggling (also not something a lot of men want to be admitting to publicly it seems.)
As long as the important, objective, facts are covered, it's all good. The rest is just potentially misleading subjective opinion and unnecessary written wank material for both the author's pleasure/ego and the pleasure of the voyeurs who enjoy reading those types of reviews :rolleyes:

One word.......MANGO......:vomit::scare::lol:
 
The review is for punters not escorts, as long as it isnt disrespectful I dont see a problem with people reliving "wank journals"

I would take any review with a pinch of salt! At the end of the day the best service provider, in any industry, cannot please everyone. It's also much easier to get negative feedback than positive feedback so dont take them to heart.
I do. I think it’s cringey and a bit pathetic. And that’s from me who wrote a couple like that at the beginning.

There’s no need for all the graphic bollocks. And, in any case, it most probably didn’t really happen like that anyway. “She took a good pounding, I made her come, she loved it”. Yeah, right.
 
Messages
396
Yes that’s what I’m saying, I have certain limits on what I want I want to be paid for sex, £70/80 is the lowest I go with it really, obviously I do tontober and stuff but what I mean is the total fee needs to be a certain amount for me to be comfortable with it. Also longer bookings can be quite intense and I would no be happy with less than £200 for 1.5 hours. My hour is £130 usually and my half hour is 80, my 1.5 is £200 or £210 in some areas.. which I feel is reasonable and logical.
My limit is a packet of pickled onion monster munch and some ribena.
 
So why did you write them in the beginning?

because I thought it was the way to do it on ukp and also thiugjts

I haven't ever I think I'm bright enough to acknowledge this is a business arrangement and I'd guess I'm not a sex god. However its nice when a good service provider makes me feel like one.

If you think its cringeworthy and pathetic, then why read it?

Because they are reviews and without reading them I wouldn’t know what they say. Stupid question.

Why let it bother you?

It doesn’t.

As you say most of it may or may not of happened anyway so why pay any attention to it?

See above.

The world is a big place and people are diverse. What's wrong with a guy who's a little bit "special" being made to feel like "he gave a good pounding, made her come and she loved it”? If I read stuff like that I'd be more inclined to think "she must be good, she's sold this guy" then maybe read another. As I said to you in the past, the punter world will attract lonely low cognitive ability type of person, not that all punters are but some will be. So If the SP can deal with these donuts and send them away thinking they are sex gods, she probably brilliant at her job and providing a great service making someone happy. What's wrong with that?

Because it’s probably bullshit but by reading that then I might book someone who I really do want to pound and I get there and am sorely disappointed. And all because someone wrote the review with his dick in his hand. Not the SPs fault but she’s been set up for a fall.

:unknown:
Answers above.
 
Interesting.

I've never been on UKP but I'm my own person I'm not just going to sheep like act like a dick because others in the said "clique" does.

It isnt a stupid question at all, maybe I could add the words "carry on" If you think its cringeworthy and pathetic when you are reading it , why carry on reading? You clearly are bothered about it because you are babbling on about it with accusations of lies. Where as I just think it's a positive on the girls service and the guys abit of a tool.



That's just silly, for that to happen you would have to believe a donut review on some ramdom forum over the Information on a girls profile and comms and he punter then blames others for their stupid mistake!

If you want a service do you
A) hunt though stupid reviews
Or
B) Ask a SP if she provides it?

Mmm rocket science that shit, isnt it? :lol:
Sure :rolleyes:
 
Just reading a review of what @Ashley_M gave as an example would make me go right past.(Her meaty pussy was dripping wet the moment I touched her etc.....this does nothing for me )
Chances are too this is really just schoolboy fantasy chat to make out their supercock or whatever and you could miss out on a great meeting.
I much prefer reviews confirming services match profile and profile is an accurate representation of the lady your interested in seeing.
If reading a profile the old saying of to good to be true stands, move on.
Other things as most have said regarding BB on services, move on, nationality never puts me off. Yes if reviews are well written on the other forum helps, just sometimes got to read between the shite.
 
Just reading a review of what @Ashley_M gave as an example would make me go right past.(Her meaty pussy was dripping wet the moment I touched her etc.....this does nothing for me )
Chances are too this is really just schoolboy fantasy chat to make out their supercock or whatever and you could miss out on a great meeting.
I much prefer reviews confirming services match profile and profile is an accurate representation of the lady your interested in seeing.
If reading a profile the old saying of to good to be true stands, move on.
Other things as most have said regarding BB on services, move on, nationality never puts me off. Yes if reviews are well written on the other forum helps, just sometimes got to read between the shite.
Exactly what I was saying but titface seems to have taken exception to it. Clearly he loves a bit of Readers’ Wives stories.
 
The review is for punters not escorts, as long as it isnt disrespectful I dont see a problem with people reliving "wank journals"

I would take any review with a pinch of salt! At the end of the day the best service provider, in any industry, cannot please everyone. It's also much easier to get negative feedback than positive feedback so dont take them to heart.
Believe me, I am well aware reviews/field reports are not written with me as the intended reader. And I don't need to be told not to take them to heart - I've been hooking for 6 years love, I've got skin like a rhino :D
I was answering in defence of punters who write "I won't go into detail..." because the person I was responding to specifically asked for escort opinions on it. If punters want to write the erotic fiction type reviews they can crack on with it. But it is not necessary and at best comes across as cringey (at worst, potentially misleading due to subjectivity.)
 
Last edited:
If you want a service do you
A) hunt though stupid reviews by some random people.
Or
B) Ask a SP if she provides it?

Mmm rocket science that shit, isnt it? :lol:
A single review in itself can be difficult to value, but a few, or those from a reviewer with a history that instills a level of confidence in their assessments are a big deal to me and have led to good bookings and saved me from a few which - based on multiple accounts - would have been poor experiences. What profiles promise are often a good way off of what happens once you have paid, but who is more likely to give you a heads up on that score?

Erotica reviews are often more about the author's ego than anything else but if you can apply the correct filters then something can be deciphered from them. The same information can be given differently, without the Mills & Boon, but specificity and detail are IMO of benefit. If the reviewer doesn't want to then the review still has merit. It seems you can be gentlemanly by saying both too much or too little!

Rose tinted glasses wearing sycophants are best not read just after eating.
 
I do. I think it’s cringey and a bit pathetic. And that’s from me who wrote a couple like that at the beginning.

There’s no need for all the graphic bollocks. And, in any case, it most probably didn’t really happen like that anyway. “She took a good pounding, I made her come, she loved it”. Yeah, right.
It does sometimes happen like that, it certainly did for me tonight. I'm one happy bunny.
:D
 
Messages
3,377
If she comes across as unfavourable on here.
Depends on why she's unfavourable and who she is unfavourable to.

I have no issues with women with opinions/views contrary to mine and appreciate people who come across genuine and are not always in marketing mode.

I'm far more likely to book an "unfavourable" with strong views than a "forum darling."

Only thing that will stop me booking someone unfavourable is if I detect certain things about them that some may not see.
 
Messages
3,377
Interesting.

I've never been on UKP but I'm my own person I'm not just going to sheep like act like a dick because others in the said "clique" does.

It isnt a stupid question at all, maybe I could add the words "carry on" If you think its cringeworthy and pathetic when you are reading it , why carry on reading? You clearly are bothered about it because you are babbling on about it with accusations of lies. Where as I just think it's a positive on the girls service and the guys abit of a tool.



That's just silly, for that to happen you would have to believe a donut review on some ramdom forum over the Information on a girls profile and comms and then after doing this, the punter then blames others for their stupid mistake!:unknown:

If you want a service do you
A) hunt though stupid reviews by some random people.
Or
B) Ask a SP if she provides it?

Mmm rocket science that shit, isnt it? :lol:
Do you actually punt? The options you have provided at the end of your post are extremely naive. I wanted to say stupid but I'm in a good mood
 
Depends on why she's unfavourable and who she is unfavourable to.

I have no issues with women with opinions/views contrary to mine and appreciate people who come across genuine and are not always in marketing mode.

I'm far more likely to book an "unfavourable" with strong views than a "forum darling."

Only thing that will stop me booking someone unfavourable is if I detect certain things about them that some may not see.
All down to gut feeling again. I have seen a lady from here that I think it is fair to say is not the most popular. I just liked her postings (as well as her media!!!) and a great time was had.
Not been back to her area since but she is on the HL when I do.
 
All down to gut feeling again. I have seen a lady from here that I think it is fair to say is not the most popular. I just liked her postings (as well as her media!!!) and a great time was had.
Not been back to her area since but she is on the HL when I do.
Over 10 years ago now I punted with a forum WG off another punting forum before even UKP existed and she was very unpopular with many other posters as she was a right braggart, had 2 degrees, her father was a multi-millionaire blah, blah, blah. I was in her area and gave her a call and in person she offered me a good service though she loved the sound of her own voice a bit too much for my liking which is why she never became a regular.

You never know for sure until you meet a WG in my experience, some WGs on here offer bad service as reviews show to my satisfaction but get loads of punters IF that's what they really are arselicking them. Some of course offer generally good service as reviews show to my satisfaction.
 
Messages
4,377
Over 10 years ago now I punted with a forum WG off another punting forum before even UKP existed and she was very unpopular with many other posters as she was a right braggart, had 2 degrees, her father was a multi-millionaire blah, blah, blah. I was in her area and gave her a call and in person she offered me a good service though she loved the sound of her own voice a bit too much for my liking which is why she never became a regular.

You never know for sure until you meet a WG in my experience, some WGs on here offer bad service as reviews show to my satisfaction but get loads of punters IF that's what they really are arselicking them. Some of course offer generally good service as reviews show to my satisfaction.
beware a forum darling eh?........as a guy one said (many times) each meet is different with any SP/punter......I guess for me if we hit it off a wee bit of craic then the session can flow but I always like a lassie who puts a shift in for their money.......?
 
It isn't though is it?




Of course he has and so have I however looks are subjective dont forget. Is it correct to deside to book a woman with a great figure and then soon as the great figure you booked opens the door, you say sorry love and turn around. We are dealing with humans it's not right to treat then like shit/meat, they are still people it isn't reasonable to expect face pictures, and even if disagree and do expect face pictures, why book a girl with no face pictures?

I think I could have a good time fucking a "great figure" and just not booking again if I didn't want too. We dont have to be dicks to a girl and give her a complex about her face.
Before you have a hissy fit, did I say at any point that was my personal opinion/how I would react personally in that situation...No I didn't...Go back and read my posts properly regarding it!...
 
Top