Discussion NE Long Thread

..... Wonder what the hourly rates were in those days.
For your delectation just one of your finest gold guinea for 60 minutes of undiluted pleasure young man .... money to be paid first as per usual...

Stop Press ... new to us girls Bessie and Bertha have just joined the team incalls only... images coming soon - still awaiting their development

Here is Nellie getting ready for outcalls in Sunderland ....
minimum booking 4hours
 
Messages
1,761
For your delectation just one of your finest gold guinea for 60 minutes of undiluted pleasure young man .... money to be paid first as per usual...

Stop Press ... new to us girls Bessie and Bertha have just joined the team incalls only... images coming soon - still awaiting their development

Here is Nellie getting ready for outcalls in Sunderland ....
minimum booking 4hours
And of course safe sex only - your chosen lady will have a choice of the finest linen or animal intestine condoms.
 
Thought that might get your attention. When you're not posting much, I assume you're updating the formula to see if demand elasticity will withstand another £1.80 on an overnighter. :D
Ha!

Seriously, there is some interesting movement in the market.... need a few more weeks to see if it’s an anomaly or a genuine change in market behaviour....
 
Nice try..... however we do not set our ladies rates. What they charge is their decision. :hi:

... and the anomaly I’ve found isn’t directly to do with rates.
You can't be leaving us hanging like that surely...
I'd imagine it's posher flats, more extras included, outcalls with no surcharge, shower time included in a booking, fluffier towels, complimentary mints.... that sort of thing? ;)
 
Kissing is extra? After all, there's a risk. I remember someone talking about a forum where punters discuss escorts who kiss during a pandemic. Utter filth.
No extras - the price advertised is the price you pay. This is part of the discussion when a lady sets her rates... and obviously we cannot infer or discuss any services on offer with clients.

We issued safety guidance and best safe / risk minimisation working practise as part of the collaboration with NHS Northumbria Sexual Health Services. We provided grants and subsidies for the additional costs to allow ladies to work within the safe/ risk minimisation working practise framework.

Apart from putting clients in a sheep dip or installing the disinfectant shower spray system that some London theatres thought was a good idea until the HSE said ‘ please don’t spray members of the public with disinfectant’ or providing full body condoms ...I can hand on heart say ‘We are doing the best we can’ :hi:
 
It's not a bad thread as it discusses legit massages. It's had issues because of it but a legit Thai massage can send you to sleep. Especially when she's walking on your back. You can feel your back touching your front (this is probably not the case)
Oh I’ve had a proper Thai walk on your back bend you into shapes massage when I lived in Munich. It was ...an experience.

It’s just...170 pages !?!? It gets a bit soporific after the first 5 pages...
 
How come Sheffield United can be owned by the Saudi Arabian. Prince Abdullah bin Musa’ad bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, yet Newcastle can't be owned by a Saudi. Is that not double standards.
I watched a very interesting video on YouTube a while ago about all the people who would try and block the takeover and their reasons. Main reason seemed to be jealousy and the fact that those in power seem to hate us.
 
Wonder if the whole rigmarole will start again with the septic trying to buy the club. Or will he run a mile.

I guess strengthening the team is going to be difficult. What player would want to join a club that the owner doesn't want to own?

Similarly I can hardly imagine FCB digging deep to strengthen the team when he seems happy enough to narrowly avoid relegation.
 
How come Sheffield United can be owned by the Saudi Arabian. Prince Abdullah bin Musa’ad bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, yet Newcastle can't be owned by a Saudi. Is that not double standards.
Isn't it something to do with Dominic Rabb publishing a list of 40 people involved in the killing of Jamaal Khashoggi and Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, the chairman of the group who made the take over attempt is on the list .. so linked with "committing the gravest human rights violations"
So the Premiership stalled on the moral fitness of the Saudi group and they seem to have got sick of the slow "progress" and fear they won't pass the fit and proper test so withdraw bid for the moment
 
Isn't it something to do with Dominic Rabb publishing a list of 40 people involved in the killing of Jamaal Khashoggi and Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, the chairman of the group who made the take over attempt is on the list .. so linked with "committing the gravest human rights violations"
So the Premiership stalled on the moral fitness of the Saudi group and they seem to have got sick of the slow "progress" and fear they won't pass the fit and proper test so withdraw bid for the moment
I don't know to be honest, I know the Saudi's have a bad reputation as far as human rights go but the owner of Sheffield United is, as far as I know, a member of their royal family. I believe the chairman was going to be Yasir Al-Rumayyan who's a banker and nothing to do with those on Dominic Rabb's list.

It's a shame, even if you don't support football or you hate Newcastle, the investment they would've brought could only benefit the region as a whole.
 
Isn't it something to do with Dominic Rabb publishing a list of 40 people involved in the killing of Jamaal Khashoggi and Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, the chairman of the group who made the take over attempt is on the list .. so linked with "committing the gravest human rights violations"
So the Premiership stalled on the moral fitness of the Saudi group and they seem to have got sick of the slow "progress" and fear they won't pass the fit and proper test so withdraw bid for the moment
As far as I know there is no provision in the O and D test for ‘moral fitness’ : it’s based on business and law fitness.
 
Isn't it something to do with Dominic Rabb publishing a list of 40 people involved in the killing of Jamaal Khashoggi and Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, the chairman of the group who made the take over attempt is on the list .. so linked with "committing the gravest human rights violations"
So the Premiership stalled on the moral fitness of the Saudi group and they seem to have got sick of the slow "progress" and fear they won't pass the fit and proper test so withdraw bid for the moment
Had it been Man united it would have been a done deal
 
Had it been Man united it would have been a done deal
So the sweatshop owner has been stopped from selling NUFC to the international journalist murderers? And that's a bad thing? :unknown:
And that’s all there is to it ? I didn’t realise it was as simple as that :timeout:
I guess we’ll just have to get back in our place and wait for the next whiter than white multi billionaire to come along eh ? Shouldn’t be long, there’s loads of them !
 
And that’s all there is to it ? I didn’t realise it was as simple as that :timeout:
I guess we’ll just have to get back in our place and wait for the next whiter than white multi billionaire to come along eh ? Shouldn’t be long, there’s loads of them !
Over on Wearside, Ellis Short wasn't great, and Stewart Donald is an opportunist shyster but rather them than the associates of a morally bankrupt Saudi prince.
 
Over on Wearside, Ellis Short wasn't great, and Stewart Donald is an opportunist shyster but rather them than the associates of a morally bankrupt Saudi prince.
I don't have a problem with them blocking the takeover because of Saudi's history, What I object to is double standards. In 2013 Prince Abdullah bin Musa'ad bin Abdulaziz Al Saud of Saudi Arabia took 50% share in Sheffield United then took full control in 2018/19.

If Sheffield United can have a Saudi prince running the club as chairman, why block Newcastle who were going to have a banker as chairman. It's all Saudi money.
 
I don't have a problem with them blocking the takeover because of Saudi's history, What I object to is double standards. In 2013 Prince Abdullah bin Musa'ad bin Abdulaziz Al Saud of Saudi Arabia took 50% share in Sheffield United then took full control in 2018/19.

If Sheffield United can have a Saudi prince running the club as chairman, why block Newcastle who were going to have a banker as chairman. It's all Saudi money.
I'd guess nobody cared because it happened outside of the Premiership, and also their international wrongdoings were not so high profile back then. It's a shame football generally has left behind the likes of John Hall and Bob Murray.
 
Top