If you allow bareback how do you live with the risk?

Messages
10
#1
So many profiles on AW advertise BB vag and/or anal and there's clearly a market for it. But assuming you're not junkie-level desperate for cash, being coerced, oblivious to the risks etc why offer it? Surely there's plenty enough business without it and how can it be worth the very real threat it poses to your health and life?
 
Messages
720
#4
I have no idea but I guess they don't feel the risk is too high. We all (I hope) do a risk assessment and decide what services to offer based on that and for some the risk of disease is low in their eyes. Whislt I am fervently against it I don't judge them simply because I too offer services that others class as risky such as OWO. Any service that involves swapping of bodily fluids carries it on risk be it semen. vaginal fluid. faeces and even urine which most people assume is sterile can spread leptospirosis as well as cytomegalic virus (fromt he Herpes family). So its a risk assessment as most services carry a risk
 
#6
If you want to find out who does BB, as I expect most punters wont want to reveal that on these forums and neither will the girls, search online for a 'breeding zone' forum and check out the north east escorts section.
 
Messages
15,239
#7
If you want to find out who does BB, as I expect most punters wont want to reveal that on these forums and neither will the girls, search online for a 'breeding zone' forum and check out the north east escorts section.
Breeding zone ? God that sounds off its head ,going to have to google that never heard of that before :D
 
Messages
12,965
#8
Anyone who does that needs there head testing oh and other parts too ,it's disgusting . :vomit:
Absolutely, WGs and punters, its utter madness playing Russian roulette with their lives and others. Whats happened to me very rarely fortunately is I have punted with a WG who didn't advertise she offered BB and didn't mention she did in person either until I started punting and then out of the blue she has said do you want to fuck me BB, I like you. This has occurred a few times over many years and I have always left but it tells me the WGs have said the same to other punters and some of them have said yes so they saw it as worth the risk of offering it, which also tells me BB is not that rare. I can only think those WGs thought offering BB would make it more likely I would return.

That's backed up by the number of WGs who do advertise they offer BB on A/W even excluding mistakes or scams telling me those that do offer it must get enough punters over not offering it. I do know though some EE WGs or their pimps think BB is OWO, they haven't learned the abbreviations which isn't smart as they are losing some if not a lot of business if they really don't offer BB to any punter.

The big question with BB is why, now a WG named Wife4Rent said it was because she liked multiple punters spunking in her giving her cream pies so that's one reason however skanky. I met a swinger once who said she had an allergy to condoms so didn't use them, I said you do know there are other condoms you could try, she wasn't aware. For some men a condom is an erection killer so that accounts for the why for some and the feeling of BB over using a condom. Then there are bug chasers, and people already infected and wanting to infect as many others as they can, hopefully low in number but who knows for sure. Some who simply don't care, some who know nothing about the issue, all makes for a fair number I reckon.

When I punt its on a risk to reward basis, taking the risks for the rewards on offer as I see them backed up by going too the GUM on a regular basis, so for me BB is a never but OWO essential. I fully realise I have no idea of the exact risk I am taking with any WG who is a complete or virtual stranger to me and could be doing anything with anyone. Punting certainly isn't for the squeamish which is fortunate as I am not.
 
Last edited:
#9
RE: wife4rent and bug catchers: her website said if you want safe sex, stay at home and wank over her pictures. Maybe she doesn't get turned on without the infection risk/"cum slut" thing. She must really love it cos she'll fuck anyone for free as long as her husband can watch/join in. Very strange but at least she's honest about it.
 
Messages
10
#10
Thanks for the contributions peeps but it really is the thoughts of WGs who do it that I wonder about and am most interested in. Whilst the adverse reaction is easy to understand I'd hope a barebacking WG would not be put off contributing. I'd likewise hope that she isn't rounded on, rather that we can satisfy our (well mine anyway!) curiosity about what motivates such an offer and how she manages to live with the risk, rather than condemning her for taking it.
 
Messages
1,249
#11
Thanks for the contributions peeps but it really is the thoughts of WGs who do it that I wonder about and am most interested in. Whilst the adverse reaction is easy to understand I'd hope a barebacking WG would not be put off contributing. I'd likewise hope that she isn't rounded on, rather that we can satisfy our (well mine anyway!) curiosity about what motivates such an offer and how she manages to live with the risk, rather than condemning her for taking it.
Errr....chances of any WG on here admitting they do bb - especially after the comments made so far...nil! :wacko:
 
Messages
1,249
#12
STI risk is not black and white, it's a spectrum. Abstinence from any sexual activity is the ONLY guarantee of not catching anything. Everything else you do - even just hand relief - can give you an STI which you can then spread to someone else.

It's almost imossible to accurately quantify the risks but at a high level I would say in order of risk - lowest to highest:
  • Abstinence - zero risk but where's the fun in that?
  • OW (relatively low risk of crabs / herpes / warts etc if affected skin is touched)
  • Hand job (relatively low risk of crabs / herpes / warts - I would say slightly higher risk than OW as OW will limit skin on skin contact)
  • Covered penetration (as above - crabs/genital warts/herpes can spread from skin on skin contact regardless of condom use)
  • OWO (all of the above plus gonorrhoea / chlamydia / syphilis)
  • BB sex (all of the above risks are significantly increased, relatively low risk of HIV infection)
  • BB anal sex (as above but high risk for HIV infection)
Apart from HIV the actual potential harm from some of these STI's is relatively low - they are on the whole quite treatable - I think that is why many take the risk. That said, with most of these infections even once treated you are told to abstain from sex for weeks or sometimes even months until fully clear. For an escort, being out of work for weeks let alone months is surely not an option? But then if you are so blasé about your own health you probably aren't going to care about infecting others so will not wait for the all clear.

And that is the other reason a barebacker will not post here - they know they are putting us all at risk and will get shot down in flames - and rightly so.
 
Messages
12,965
#14
Thanks for the contributions peeps but it really is the thoughts of WGs who do it that I wonder about and am most interested in. Whilst the adverse reaction is easy to understand I'd hope a barebacking WG would not be put off contributing. I'd likewise hope that she isn't rounded on, rather that we can satisfy our (well mine anyway!) curiosity about what motivates such an offer and how she manages to live with the risk, rather than condemning her for taking it.
So skip punters posts then.:rolleyes: Admin has confirmed punters are allowed to post on question for WGs threads and WGs can post on question for punters threads.
 
Top